NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Pham [2021] NSWCATOD 41 Hearing dates: 11 – 12 February 2021 and by written submissions dated 19 February, 1 and 5 March 2021 Date of orders: 14 April 2021 Decision date: 14 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: The Hon F Marks, Principal Member A Torrens, Senior Member D Preswick, Senior Member S Lovrovich, General Member Decision: (1) The registration of the respondent as a pharmacist is cancelled. (2) We fix a non-review period under section 163A(3)(a) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) of 2 years. (3) The review body under section 163A is this Tribunal. (4) The respondent is to pay the costs of the applicant assessed in default of agreement. Catchwords: HEALTH — professional registration and discipline — complaint that respondent pharmacist responsible for conduct of others — whether complaint framed with sufficient particularity — held any deficiency overcome because proceedings conducted on basis respondent understood case being brought against him — no denial of procedural fairness HEALTH — professional registration and discipline — pharmacist also proprietor of pharmacy — multiple instances of inappropriate dispensing of regulated medication by respondent and other breaches of duty as a pharmacist — failure to comply with responsibilities as a proprietor — finding of professional misconduct — cancellation of registration as a pharmacist appropriate protective order — review period of 2 years — costs order made Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 165B(5A) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), ss 41, 139B, 139E, 150, 163A Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Regulation 2008 (NSW), cl 54 Cases Cited: Chen v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWCA 186 Ex parte Tziniolis; Re The Medical Practitioners Act (1966) 67 SR (NSW) 448 Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Elliott [2018] NSWCATOD 47 King v Health Care Complaints Commission [2011] NSWCA 353 Lucire v Health Care Complaints Commission [2011] NSWCA 99 Texts Cited: Pharmacy Board of Australia, "Code of conduct" (March 2014) Pharmacy Board of Australia, "Guidelines for proprietor pharmacists" (September 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Steven Pham (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Donnelly (Applicant) S Barnes (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate