NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alexakis v Wan [2021] NSWSC 367 Hearing dates: 29-30 March 2021 Date of orders: 12 April 2021 Decision date: 12 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Defendants held to be entitled to terminate the contract and recover the deposit. Catchwords: LAND LAW – contracts for the sale of land – deposit payable in two instalments – second instalment payable "on the 4th month after the contract date" – contract dated 4 April 2019 – whether second instalment required to be paid by 4 August 2019, or by 31 August 2019 – held that payment was required by 4 August 2019 – vendors held to be entitled to terminate contract on 5 August 2019 – Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 181(1)(d) definition of "month" as "calendar month" – Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 21 definition of "calendar month" EQUITY – equitable remedies – relief in respect of exercise of legal rights – exercise of right to terminate contract for sale of land – breach giving rise to right of termination brought about by purchaser's mistake – mistake not caused or contributed to by conduct of vendors – serious breach in failing to pay part of deposit within time agreed to be essential – no substantial loss or prejudice to vendors if contract ordered to be performed – not unconscientious of vendors to rely upon their termination – equitable relief declined – forfeiture of deposit of 5% of the price not unjust or inequitable in the circumstances – no order made for return of deposit under s 55(2A) of Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) ss 55(2A), 181 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 21 Cases Cited: Auburn Shopping Village Pty Ltd v Nelmeer Hoteliers Pty Ltd (2018) 19 BPR 38,569; [2018] NSWCA 114 Auburn Shopping Village Pty Ltd v Nelmeer Hoteliers Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1230 Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; [1978] HCA 50 Dodds v Walker [1981] 1 WLR 1027 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544; [2017] HCA 12 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Re Weston Application; Employers Mutual Indemnity (Workers Compensation) Ltd v Omni Corporation Pty Ltd (2009) 255 ALR 362; [2009] NSWSC 264 Romanos v Pentagold Investments Pty Ltd (2003) 217 CLR 367; [2003] HCA 58 Rushcutters Bay Developments Pty Ltd v Dragon Asset Investment Pty Ltd (No 2) (2017) 18 BPR 37,025; [2017] NSWSC 866 Shiloh Spinners v Harding [1973] AC 691 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315; [2003] HCA 57 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Theo Alexakis (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Chi Hing Wan (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Kwan Yee Chan (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D R Pritchard SC with Mr M H Southwick (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mr D W Rayment with Mr A Smorchevsky (Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate