NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lu v R; Huang v R [2021] NSWCCA 68 Hearing dates: 30 November 2020 Date of orders: 16 April 2021 Decision date: 16 April 2021 Before: Bell P at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [72]. Decision: With respect to the Applicant Wei Lun Lu: 1. Extend time for the Applicant to seek leave to appeal against sentence to 1 September 2020. 2. Leave to appeal against sentence granted.
3. Appeal dismissed.
With respect to the Applicant Chun Huang: 1. Extend time for the Applicant to seek leave to appeal against sentence to 3 September 2020. 2. Leave to appeal against sentence granted.
3. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – applicants pleaded guilty to Commonwealth offence of attempting to possess a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug (methamphetamine) – whether Xiao v R error established – error demonstrated – no lesser sentence warranted on resentencing – appeals dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: Bae v R [2020] NSWCCA 35 Betka v R [2020] NSWCCA 191 Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25 Cameron v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 339; [2002] HCA 6 Diaz v R [2019] NSWCCA 216 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Gow (2015) 252 A Crim R 573; [2015] NSWCCA 208 DL v The Queen (2018) 265 CLR 215; [2018] HCA 32 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Khalid v R (2020) 102 NSWLR 160; [2020] NSWCCA 73 R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Nguyen; R v Pham (2010) 205 A Crim R 106; [2010] NSWCCA 238 R v Qutami (2001) 127 A Crim 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Shannon (1979) 21 SASR 442; R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Siganto v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 656; [1998] HCA 74 Tyler v R (2007) 173 A Crim R 458; [2007] NSWCCA 247 Weber v R [2020] NSWCCA 103 Winchester v R (1992) 58 A Crim R 345 Xiao v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCCA 4 Yin v R [2019] NSWCCA 217 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wei Lun Lu and Chun Huang (Applicants) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms E McLaughlin (Applicant Lu) Mr P Coady (Applicant Huang) Ms B Anniwell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate