NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Warehouse Pty Ltd atf Warehouse Invest Trust v Valuer General [2021] NSWLEC 32 Hearing dates: 9 April 2021 Date of orders: 13 April 2021 Decision date: 13 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [39]-[40] Catchwords: APPEALS — Leave to appeal — Application for leave to appeal after time for appeal expired — Length of delay — Reasons for delay — Arguable case — s 38 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW) — Leave granted Legislation Cited: Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW) ss 35AA, 37, 38 Cases Cited: Gallo v Dawson [1990] HCA 30; (1990) 93 ALR 479 Fowler v Valuer General [2015] NSWLEC 133 Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516; [1998] HCA 27 Jassls Pty Ltd v Valuer General [2006] NSWLEC 59 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Mehta [1975] 1 WLR 1087; [1975] 2 All ER 1084 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The Warehouse Pty Ltd atf Warehouse Invest Trust (Applicant) Valuer General (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Waterson (Applicant) P Rankins, solicitor (Respondent)
Solicitors: King & Wood Mallesons (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00067972; 2021/00068066 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. By two notices of motion filed 9 March 2021, The Warehouse Pty Ltd atf Warehouse Invest Trust ('Warehouse') seeks relief pursuant to s 38(2) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW) ('Valuation Act'), that it be allowed to commence two Class 3 appeal proceedings (also filed 9 March 2021) after the 60-day period for making the appeals prescribed by s 38(1) of the Valuation Act has expired. 2. Warehouse seeks to commence appeal proceedings under s 37 of the Valuation Act against the Valuer General's determinations on 5 March 2020 to disallow the objections made to valuations of land owned by Warehouse, located at 87-103 Epsom Road, Rosebery (the 'Land'), as at 1 July 2017 ('2017 objection') and 1 July 2018 ('2018 objection') (together 'the Objections'). The Valuer General neither consents to, nor opposes, the motions. 3. The motions came before me (as List Judge), and were heard, on 9 April 2021. Mr L Waterson of counsel, appeared for Warehouse and Mr P Rankins, solicitor, appeared for the Valuer General. 4. Warehouse reads the affidavit of Sebastian Tarlton Hanscomb, solicitor for Warehouse, affirmed 5 March 2021, which included extensive annexures comprising approximately 400 pages of material (the 'March Affidavit'), and a supplementary affidavit of Mr Hanscomb affirmed 7 April 2021 (the 'April Affidavit').
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate