NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gleeson v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 63 Hearing dates: 25 February 2021 Date of orders: 25 February 2021 Decision date: 21 April 2021 Before: Bell P; Macfarlan JA; White JA Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), quash the judgment of his Honour Judge McLennan of the District Court declining to recuse himself from any further hearing of proceedings 2019/253909. (2) An order in the nature of prohibition prohibiting his Honour Judge McLennan from further hearing proceedings 2019/253909. (3) No order as to costs. (4) Reasons for judgment reserved. Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES – bias – apprehended bias – judge declined to recuse himself from presiding at criminal trial of applicant – judge's partner of 29 years a Crown prosecutor who gave advice to police as to laying of charges against applicant – that Crown prosecutor not involved in subsequent pre-trial steps – whether judge disqualified by interest or association – application of Ebner test – fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that judge might not bring an impartial mind to his conduct of forthcoming trial of applicant Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(2), 66A(1), 66C(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 8, 66, 69-81 Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 (NSW), s 13 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 97 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Aussie Airlines Pty Ltd v Australian Airlines Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 215 Chamoun v District Court of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 187 Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2017 (2019) 267 CLR 350; [2019] HCA 9 Dovade Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Group (1999) 46 NSWLR 168; [1999] NSWCA 113 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438; [2002] HCA 51 Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135; [2015] HCA 20 Kennedy v Cahill (1995) 118 FLR 60; [1995] FLC 92-605 Polsen v Harrison [2021] NSWCA 23 The Queen v LK (2010) 241 CLR 177; [2010] HCA 17 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41; [1994] HCA 30 Texts Cited: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW), Prosecution Guidelines (29 March 2021 ed) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Jacob Gleeson (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Attorney General for New South Wales (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Bashir SC / Z C F Heger (Applicant) Submitting appearance (First and Second Respondents) D Kell SC / M Adams (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate