NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Ming Tian Real Property Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 386 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 April 2021 Decision date: 16 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Order that there be no order as to costs of the proceedings. Plaintiff to pay Defendant's cost of the application for costs. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — General rule that costs follow the event — Where application to set aside statutory demand did not proceed – Where no determination of proceedings on the merits Legislation Cited: - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: - Ayrton Investments Pty Ltd v Andrlik (2000) 34 ACSR 643; [2000] ACTSC 55 - Dynamics Co Pty Ltd v G & M Nicholas Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 206 - Felkro Nominees Pty Ltd v Austissue Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ACSR 607; [1993] FCA 455 - Jem Number Four Pty Ltd v Southern Cross Construction (NSW) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 602 - Re Pierotti & Fanani Pty Ltd as trustee for the Caesars Properties Unit Trust; Re Etruscan Properties Ltd [2018] NSWSC 457 - Re Telegraph Point Sports & Recreation Club Ltd [2020] NSWSC 616 - Re The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 - Soudan Lane Pty Ltd v Glen Bradshaw t/as Pacific Coast Digital [2007] NSWSC 772 Category: Costs Parties: Ming Tian Real Property Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Rose Ives Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: NYH Li (Plaintiff) JC Lee (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate