NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Ceissman [2021] NSWSC 390 Hearing dates: 15 April 2021 Date of orders: 15 April 2021 Decision date: 15 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 31(1) of the Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 ("the Act"), vary the extended supervision order made by the Court on 18 July 2018 by replacing the schedule to that order with the amended conditions set out in Schedule A ("the amended ESO conditions"); (2) Pursuant to s 11 of the Act, direct the defendant to comply with the amended ESO conditions; (3) Order that access to the Court's file in this proceeding be restricted, such that access would be permitted to a non-party only with the leave of a judge of the Court and with prior notice to the parties so as to allow them an opportunity to be heard in respect of the application for access. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS – Extended supervision orders – Application – Variation Legislation Cited: Community Protection Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (NSW) Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Ceissman (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1237 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Greg Ceissman (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Fraser (Plaintiff) Dr A Hughes (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Legal Aid NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/107952
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate