NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Li v R [2021] NSWCCA 75 Hearing dates: 23 November 2020 Decision date: 23 April 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Bellew J at [75]; Wright J at [76] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – supply a prohibited drug on an ongoing basis – maximum penalty of imprisonment for 20 years – four matters on a Form 1 – whether sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive – whether applicant had a justified sense of grievance by reason of receiving a longer sentence than a co-offender – same judge sentencing both offenders – clear differences between applicant and co-offender – parity principles observed – no error on part of sentencing judge – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Chamon v R [2020] NSWCCA 112 Corda v R [2014] NSWCCA 281 Dayment v R [2018] NSWCCA 132 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Jimmy v The Queen (2010) 77 NSWLR 540; [2010] NSWCCA 60 King v R [2018] NSWCCA 273 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284 Paxton v R (2011) 219 A Crim R 104; [2011] NSWCCA 242 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jielun Li – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: M Curry – Applicant C Young – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate