NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Macdonald; R v Edward Obeid; R v Moses Obeid (No 1) [2019] NSWSC 322 Date of orders: 10 May 2019 Decision date: 18 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fullerton J Decision: Evidence admitted for limited purpose – see [17], [69] and [82]. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Documentary evidence – Admissibility of evidence of the conduct of one or more than one alleged co-conspirators after conspiracy had been executed against all conspirators in conspiracy trial Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Mining Act 1992 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahern v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 87; [1988] HCA 39 Elomar v R [2014] NSWCCA 303; (2014) 300 FLR 323 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Maitland v R; Macdonald v R [2019] NSWCCA 32 R v Baladjam (No 38) [2008] NSWSC 1458 R v Milne (No 1) [2010] NSWSC 932 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The Crown Ian Michael Macdonald (Accused) Edward Moses Obeid (Accused) Moses Edward Obeid (Accused) Representation: Counsel: S Callan / R Rodger (Crown) M Cunneen SC / J Davidson (Accused Macdonald) CT Barry QC (Accused Edward Obeid) MJ Neil QC / M Kalyk (Accused Moses Obeid)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Accused Macdonald) M Bowe (Accused Edward Obeid) Murphy's Lawyers Inc (Accused Moses Obeid) File Number(s): 2015/212910; 2015/214251; 2015/212851
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate