NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Forero Gomez; R v Le; R v Pham; R v Stephens [2021] NSWDC 131 Hearing dates: 31 March 2021 Decision date: 22 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Forero-Gomez: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 6 years 3 months. Non-parole period of 3 years 6 months. Le: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 4 years 6 months. Non-parole period of 2 years 8 months. Pham: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 4 years 6 months. Non-parole period of 2 years 6 months Stephens: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 4 years 6 months. Non-parole period of 2 years 3 months. Catchwords: CRIME – Manufacture prohibited drug >= large commercial quantity - Take part manufacture prohibited drug >= large commercial quantity SENTENCING - Relevant factors on sentence - multiple offenders - early guilty pleas - one offender entered a late plea - a large commercial quantity illicit drugs converted into marketable form - role of each offender- reasons for distinguishing one from the other – all labourers for hire - short term role - critical to manufacture process - anyone could have done the job no special skills required – aware of nature of operation – parity - modest differences in one offender's role - modest difference in offender's subjective cases - differences reflected in findings of special circumstances - one offender changes version under cross-examination - all offenders have solid subjective cases - all are good prospects for rehabilitation - objective seriousness of offending requires adequate punishment despite offending occupying one day only Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985 Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Afu v R [2017] NSWCCA 246 Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58 Blackman & Walters [2001] NSW CCA 121 BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159 Clarke-Jeffries v R [2019] NSWCCA 56 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mawad [2015] NSWCCA 227 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520 Howard v R [2019] NSWCCA 109 Kristensen v R [2018] NSWCCA 189 KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51 Lau v R [2010] NSWCCA 43. Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Olbrich v the Queen (1999) 199 CLR 270 Oncu and others v R [2018] NSWDC 106 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Blair (2005) 152 A Crim R 462 R v Chan [1999] NSWCCA 103 R v Cheung; R v Choi [2010] NSWCCA 244. R v DW [2012] NSWCCA 66 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168; [2004] NSWCCA 131 Rios v R [2012] NSWCCA 8 Ruano v R [2011] NSWCCA 149 Ryan v R [2017] NSWCCA 209 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Weininger v the Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629 Yardley v Betts (1979) 22 SASR 108 Texts Cited: Parole Supervision and Re-offending: Wai-Yin Wan, Suzanne Poynton, Gerard van Doorn and Don Weatherburn (2016) Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology v149. No.4. p 497. http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Documents/ parolesupervisionandreoffending.pdf Category: Sentence Parties: Esteban Ricardo Forero Gomez (the offender) John Capistan Le (the offender) David Quang Dung Pham (the offender) Jordan Stephens (the offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr D Cronin, with Ms S Wallace (for the offender Forero-Gomez) Mr A Djemal (for the offender Le) Mr J Peluso (for the offender Pham) Mr J Korn (for the offender Stephens)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate