NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v WS [2021] NSWDC 135 Hearing dates: 12 March 2021 Date of orders: 1 April 2021 Decision date: 01 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: R. J. Weber SC DCJ Decision: (1) The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 4 years and 3 months, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months. (2) The Court directs that such a term of imprisonment shall commence on 1 April 2021 and that the non-parole period shall expire on 30 September 2023, with the balance to expire on 30 June 2025. Catchwords: CRIMES — Child sex offences — Indecent assault — Sexual intercourse without consent — historic offences SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Disputed facts — Findings of fact – Question as to the age of the victim on the date of the offences – Where the date range of indictment encompassed periods at which the victim was 15 years of age and 16 years of age – Where different maximum penalties were available depending on the victim's age under the now repealed s 61D(1) – The date range on indictment are particulars, not elements – no finding to be attributed to the jury – the evidence establishes the date of the offences beyond reasonable doubt SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Disputed facts — Findings of fact at sentence – Uncharged sexual acts not proven beyond reasonable doubt – Where the use of a knife is an integral part of the res gestae and therefore attributable to the jury's finding of guilt beyond reasonable doubt SENTENCING — Aggravating factors — Use of weapon — Mitigating factors — No record of previous convictions — Prior good character — Not part of a planned or organised criminal activity — Unlikely to re-offend — Subjective considerations on sentence — Special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Dimian v R [2016] NSWCCA 223 at [49] Gregg v The Queen [2020] NSWCCA 245 at [395] Keung v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 193 at [25]-[31] Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 at [51] R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 at [377]-[378] R v Lilley (2004) 150 A Crim R 591 at [41], [53] R v King (2004) 150 A Crim R 409 at [139]-[141] R v Olbrich (1999) CLR 270 at [27]-[28] R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Saffron v The Queen (1988) 17 NSWLR 395 Savvas v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 1 at [8] The Queen v Meaton (1986) 160 CLR 359 at p 367 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) WS (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Curry (Crown) Mr P Doyle (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate