NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dong [2021] NSWCCA 82 Hearing dates: 19 March 2021 Date of orders: 30 April 2021 Decision date: 30 April 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Bellew J at [2]; Beech-Jones J at [3] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the sentence imposed by Hidden AJ on 18 September 2020 and in lieu thereof sentence the respondent to a term of imprisonment of 21 years commencing on 9 June 2018 and expiring on 8 June 2039 with a non‑parole period of 15 years 8 months and a balance of term of 5 years and 4 months; (3) The respondent will be first eligible for release on parole on 8 February 2034. Catchwords: SENTENCING — Crown appeal against inadequacy of sentence — murder – House v R error - purposes of sentencing – failure to consider protection of the community from the offender – Veen (No 2) – proportionality of sentence – offender suffering mental illness – offence committed without apparent motive – manifest inadequacy – objective seriousness of offence – poor subjective case – appeal allowed – respondent resentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 CMB v Attorney General for the State of NSW (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DPP v Burton [2020] NSWCCA 54 Elturk v R [2014] NSWCCA 61; 239 A Crim R 584 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Manojlovic v R; R v Manojlovic [2020] NSWCCA 315 Murray v R [2019] NSWCCA 235 R v Dong [2020] NSWSC 1277 R v Edwards (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 1815 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Fantakis; R v Woods [2018] NSWSC 1700 R v Hiroki [2015] NSWSC 496 R v Ly [2018] NSWSC 197 R v Marcus John Lee [2012] NSWSC 1240 R v Qingin Chen [2010] NSWSC 64 R v Ruttley (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 1582 R v Shepherd [2020] NSWSC 141 R v Stonestreet [2020] NSWCCA 212 Roff v R [2017] NSWCCA 208 Veen (No 2) (1987) 164 CLR 465 Veen v The Queen (No 1) (1979) 143 CLR 458 Wong v R (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Shuo Dong (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P McGrath SC; C Young (Crown) M Johnston SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate