NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Super Vision Resources Ltd BVI Registered No 1810534 v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] NSWCA 70 Hearing dates: 26 April 2021 Decision date: 27 April 2021 Before: Meagher JA Decision: Dismiss the first and second respondents' notice of motion filed 4 March 2021 with costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – procedure – stay pending special leave to appeal to the High Court – where orders for payment of money to trustee in bankruptcy – where trustee in bankruptcy gave undertaking not to distribute or deal with any funds paid to him – whether stay necessary to preserve subject matter of appeal – whether costs of motion seeking stay should be "costs in the cause in the High Court" Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 601AD(5), 601AH(5) Cases Cited: Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (No 1) (1986) 161 CLR 681; [1986] HCA 84 Rinehart v Welker (2012) 83 NSWLR 347; [2012] NSWCA 1 Super Vision Resources Ltd v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 14 Super Vision Resources Pty Ltd BVI Registered No 1810534 v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 319 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Super Vision Resources Ltd BVI Registered No 1810534 (Appellant) AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Qiao Wang (Second Respondent) Lawrence Xu (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J P Knackstredt (Appellant) B M Zipser (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate