NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v R [2021] NSWCCA 85 Hearing dates: 5 February 2021 Date of orders: 3 May 2021 Decision date: 03 May 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Beech-Jones J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted (2) Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME - trial - appeal against conviction – charges of sexual and indecent assault – question of unreasonable and unsafe verdict by reason of inconsistency of verdicts – whether guilty verdict for sexual assault inconsistent with acquittal for indecent assault – whether rational explanation for differing verdicts Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Mackenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Nguyen (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: I Lloyd QC/A Radojev (Applicant) K Jeffreys (Crown)
Solicitors: Crimlaw Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) File Number(s): 2018/188457 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 08 July 2019 Before: Williams ADCJ File Number(s): 2018/188457
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate