NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McAlister v SAS Trustee Corporation [2020] NSWDC 896 Hearing dates: 6 November 2020 Date of orders: 26 November 2020 Decision date: 26 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Decision of the Police Superannuation Advisory Committee set aside. Plaintiff's pension be increased to 90% of the attributed salary. Catchwords: Police Superannuation – Abnormal risk benefit – Quantification of the benefit – Three certified infirmities: (1) left hallux rigidus (2) cervical spondylosis (3) sensorineural deafness – P was a member of Highway Patrol for most of his career and spent most of that time as a motorcycle rider – Extent of disablement apportioned as (1) 30% (2) 60% (3) 10% - Therefore of the 15% of salary of office available were (1) 4.5% (2) 9% (3) 1.5% - Allowed by Court was (1) 4% (2) 1% (3) nil – Base rate of 85% of salary increased to 90% of salary by findings of Court. Legislation Cited: Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 Workers Compensation Act 1987 Cases Cited: Calman v Commissioner of Police (1999) 19 NSWCCR 40 Conway v SASTC [2012] NSWDC 249; (2012) 11 DDCR 212 Green v SASTC [2013] NSWDC 200 SASTC v Green [2014] NSWCA 289 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff – Geoffrey McAlister Defendant – SAS Trustee Corporation Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff – M. Hammond Defendant – T. Ower
Solicitors: D. Cabal (Carrol & O'Dea) L. Doyle (SASTC) File Number(s): RJ00424/19 Publication restriction: Nil.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate