NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Weisbord v Rodny (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 458 Hearing dates: 23 March 2021 Decision date: 30 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See pars [18], [26] and [28] Catchwords: EVIDENCE — Course of evidence — Re-opening case — Where the Court made an order that probate be granted of an informal will under s 8 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) — Where the Court consequently did not decide an alternative application for family provision orders under s 59 of the Succession Act — Where the Court of Appeal set aside the order granting probate of the informal will and remitted the proceedings to the trial judge to determine the application for family provision orders — Where the defendant sought orders permitting the parties to serve further updating evidence without formally applying to re-open his case — Where application to serve further updating evidence refused Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Rodny v Weisbord (2020) 102 NSWLR 403; [2020] NSWCA 22 Weisbord v Rodny; Rodney v Weisbord [2018] NSWSC 1866 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Proceedings 2016 / 225246: Jeannette Weisbord (first plaintiff/cross defendant) Alexander Weisbord (second plaintiff) Joel Weisbord (third plaintiff) Laurence Rodny (first defendant/cross claimant)
Proceedings 2015 / 324982: Jeannette Weisbord (plaintiff) Laurence Rodny (defendant)
Proceedings 2015 / 324966: Joel Weisbord (plaintiff) Laurence Rodny (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate