NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Trimmings [2021] NSWDC 156 Hearing dates: 27 January 2021 and by submissions Date of orders: 03 February 2021 Decision date: 03 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Grant DCJ Decision: I find the accused not guilty. Catchwords: Criminal law – judge alone trial – manslaughter –no obvious signs of injury- 'sorry business' – domestic relationship – expert evidence – relationship evidence – not guilty verdict Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Barca v The Queen (1975) 133 CLR 82; [1975]HCA 42 Frawley (1992) 69 A Crim R 208 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619; [1911] HCA 66 Plomp v The Queen (1963)110 CLR 234; [1963] HCA 44 R v AM (2000) 117 A Crim R 176 R v PL 261 ALR 365; [2009] NSW CCA 256 R v Toki (2000) 116 A Crim R 536; [2000] NSWSC 999 The Queen v Baden‑Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Thomas v The Queen (1960) 102 CLR 584; [1960] HCA 2 Wilson v The Queen (1970) 123 CLR 334 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Greg Trimmings (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr Pincott (DPP) Mr Wilson SC
Solicitors: Mr Thomas (DPP) Ms Somerville File Number(s): 2018/00135821
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate