NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Howe Architects Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2021] NSWLEC 1233 Hearing dates: 19 and 22-24 February 2021 Date of orders: 11 May 2021 Decision date: 11 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: The Orders of the Court are: (1) The applicant is granted leave to amend the application to rely on the amended proposal in Exhibit E. (2) The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed. (3) The appeal is dismissed. (4) Development Application No. 36/20 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling and construction of a four storey residential flat building over basement parking at 2 Nulla Nulla Street, Turramurra, is refused. (5) The Exhibits, other than Exhibits 1 and 2, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – alterations and additions to an existing dwelling and construction of a residential flat building – prohibited development in the zone – local heritage item – application relies on the heritage incentive clause for permissibility – the heritage item is the dwelling – the land referred to in the heritage incentive clause is the cadastral lot identified by Schedule 5 to Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 – the proposed development would adversely affect the heritage significance of the heritage item – the proposed development would have a significant adverse effect on the amenity of the surrounding area – the development standards in the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2012 apply to the proposed development – exceedance of the height of buildings development standard – the environmental planning grounds identified by the applicant in the written request are not sufficient to justify the exceedance of the height of buildings development standard Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4.15, 4.46, 8.7, 8.15 Heritage Act 1977 ss 4, 57 Interpretation Act 1987 ss 6, 9, 11 Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 cll 1.7, 4.3, 4.6, 5.10, 6.2 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 ss 34, 39 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development cll 4, 5, 28 Cases Cited: Chamwell Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council (2007) 151 LGERA 400; [2007] NSWLEC 114 Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90 Fox v North Sydney Council [2020] NSWLEC 1056 Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118 Leichhardt Council v Telstra Corporation (2005) 139 LGERA 62; [2005] NSWLEC 152 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 RebelMH Neutral Bay Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWCA 130 Stamford Property Services Pty Ltd v Mulpha Australia Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 730; [2019] NSWCA 141 Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827 Texts Cited: Apartment Design Guide Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, Practice Note Class 1 Development Appeals, (2018) The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Howe Architects Pty Ltd (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Wright SC (Applicant) C Novak (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate