NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Joel v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2021] NSWCATOD 54 Hearing dates: 22 April 2021 Date of orders: 6 May 2021 Decision date: 06 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: LICENSING – real estate agent – offences involving dishonesty – whether offences can be ignored – whether offences trivial - whether sufficient time has elapsed since offending Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 Cases Cited: AML v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADT 5 Bek v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2004] NSWADT 149 Commissioner for Fair Trading, NSW Office of Fair Trading v O'Connor (GD) [2007] NSWADTAP 37 Ex Parte Tzinliolis: Re the Medical Practitioners' Act [1966] 1 NSWR 357 Hammond v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2020] NSWCATOD 132 Hunt v Director General, Department of Services, Technology, and Administration [2010] NSWADT 186 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1FCR 353 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Nizhnikov v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2006] NSWADT 284 Salcedo v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATOD 19 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Stamatelatos v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 156 Wilson v The Commissioner for NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATOD 79 Yelland v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2005] NSWADT 293 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sam Joel (Applicant) Commissioner of Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-Represented) NSW Fair Trading Legal Services (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00015003 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate