NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wallbank v Angelos [2021] NSWCATAP 128 Hearing dates: 27 April 2021 Date of orders: 10 May 2021 Decision date: 10 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Curtin SC, Senior Member S Goodman SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appellants have leave to appeal. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) The proceedings be remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Tribunal for re-hearing. Catchwords: APPEALS – leave to appeal – substantial miscarriage of justice - absence of a sufficiently clear and cogent account of the facts relevant to the issue for determination – finding contrary to the evidence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, s 80 and Sch 4, cl 12 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Costa v The Public Trustee of NSW [2008] NSWCA 223 Pahlow-Silady v Siladi [1997] NSWCA 241 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Myles Wallbank (First Appellant) Kirsten Battin (Second Appellant) Dione Angelos (Respondent) Representation: First Appellant (Self-Represented) Second Appellant (First Appellant) Respondent (Self-Represented) File Number(s): 2021/00056132 (AP 21/08668) Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 18 February 2021 Before: S Dutra, General Member File Number(s): RT 20/41739
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate