NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dyco Hotels Pty Ltd v Laundy Hotels (Quarry) Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 504 Hearing dates: 12-14 April 2021 Date of orders: 10 May 2021 Decision date: 10 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Contract held not to have been frustrated. Vendor held to have terminated contract for breach by purchasers. Vendor entitled to forfeit deposit and recover damages for loss of bargain. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – agreement for sale of hotel property and business – vendor obliged to carry on business in usual manner until completion of contract – public health orders made in response to COVID-19 pandemic limited ability to operate business – whether vendor in breach of obligation to carry on business in usual manner – obligation construed as not requiring the carrying on of business in any manner contrary to law – vendor held not to be in breach CONTRACTS – discharge by frustration – agreement for sale of hotel property and business – vendor obliged to carry on business in usual manner until completion of contract – public health orders in response to COVID-19 pandemic limited ability to operate business – actual performance of obligation departed from that which the parties contemplated would occur – whether contract frustrated – essential purpose of contract was for sale and transfer of particular assets for agreed price – vendor's obligation to carry on business until completion designed to further this essential purpose – no warranties given as to future performance of business – unexpected events did not give rise to such a fundamentally different situation that it would not be just to hold the parties bound to the terms of the contract – held that contract not frustrated CONTRACTS – damages – assessment – date for assessment of damages – vendor terminated contract for purchaser's breach – damages for loss of bargain – held that damages should be assessed as at date the bargain was lost – no justification to assess damages at later time – avoided loss principle – whether vendor obtained compensating advantage by retaining assets the subject of sale – not established that retention of assets is attributable to a decision made in consequence of the purchaser's breach – mitigation of damage principles not engaged Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 100 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 55(2A) Liquor Act 2007 (NSW) Liquor Regulation 2018 (NSW) Public Health Act 2010 (NSW), ss 7, 10 Public Health (COVID-19 Gatherings) Order 2020 Public Health (COVID-19 Places of Social Gathering) Order 2020 Public Health (COVID-19 Restrictions on Gathering and Movement) Order (No 2) 2020 Public Health (COVID-19 Restrictions on Gathering and Movement) Order (No 3) 2020 Cases Cited: ASIC v Atlantic 3 – Financial (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] 2 Qd R 399; [2006] QCA 540 Baguley v Lifestyle Homes Mackay Pty Ltd [2015] QCA 75 Barrak Corporation Pty Ltd v Jaswil Properties Pty Ltd (2016) 18 BPR 35,759; [2016] NSWCA 32 Brisbane City Council v Group Projects Pty Ltd (1979) 145 CLR 143 Carrapetta v Rado (2012) 16 BPR 30,997; [2012] NSWCA 202 Clark v Macourt (2013) 253 CLR 1; [2013] HCA 56 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 12 El Ali v Tritton [2019] NSWCA 111 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Gerraty v McGavin (1914) 18 CLR 152 Global Network Services Pty Ltd v Legion Telecall Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 279 Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351 Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740 Langley v Foster (1906) 4 CLR 167 Lindsay-Owen v Associated Dairies Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1095 McNally v Waitzer [1981] 1 NSWLR 294 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Ng v Filmlock Pty Ltd (2014) 88 NSWLR 146; [2014] NSWCA 389 oOH! Media Roadside Pty Ltd v Diamond Wheels Pty Ltd (2011) 32 VR 255; [2011] VSCA 116 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451; [2004] HCA 35 Ronnoc Finance Ltd v Spectrum Network Systems Ltd (1997) 45 NSWLR 624 Rushcutters Bay Developments Pty Ltd v Dragon Asset Investment Pty Ltd (No 2) (2017) BPR 37,025; [2017] NSWSC 866 Ruthol Pty Ltd v Tricon (Australia) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 443 Sunbird Plaza Pty Ltd v Maloney (1988) 166 CLR 245 Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 236 CLR 272; [2009] HCA 8 Texts Cited: K Lewison and D Hughes, The Interpretation of Contracts in Australia (Lawbook Co, 2012) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dyco Hotels Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Quarryman Hotel Operations Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Daphne Maria Parras (Third Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant) Colin Michael Parras (Fourth Plaintiff/Fourth Cross-Defendant) Laundy Hotels (Quarry) Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr C D Freeman (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) Dr C J Birch SC with Mr B DeBuse (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate