NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Macdonald; R v Edward Obeid; R v Moses Obeid (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 1286 Decision date: 18 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fullerton J Decision: The Crown's application to tender Mr Fang's evidence is refused. Catchwords: EVIDENCE — Hearsay — Exceptions — Whether evidence admissible under ss 65(1) and (3) of the Evidence Act — Whether evidence should be excluded under s 135 of the Evidence Act — Evidence inadmissible Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 62, 65 Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) Cases Cited: Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 R v Macdonald; R v Edward Obeid; R v Moses Obeid (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 898 Ryan v Watkins [2005] NSWCA 426 Sio v The Queen [2016] HCA 32; 259 CLR 47 Thomas v The State of New South Wales [2008] NSWCA 316; 74 NSWLR 34 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The Crown Ian Michael Macdonald (Accused) Edward Moses Obeid (Accused) Moses Edward Obeid (Accused) Representation: Counsel: S Callan / R Rodger (Crown) M Cunneen SC / J Davidson (Accused Macdonald) CT Barry QC (Accused Edward Obeid) MJ Neil QC / M Kalyk (Accused Moses Obeid)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Accused Macdonald) M Bowe (Accused Edward Obeid) Murphy's Lawyers Inc (Accused Moses Obeid) File Number(s): 2015/212910; 2015/214251; 2015/212851
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate