NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Paulo v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWSC 517 Hearing dates: 8 April 2021 Date of orders: 13 May 2021 Decision date: 13 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Brereton JA Decision: (1) Pursuant to SCR, Pt 51B r 5(5), extend time to commence these proceedings to 21 September 2020; (2) Dismiss the summons; and (3) By consent, order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – Leave to appeal – From Local Court – From committal proceedings – Where parties in agreement that magistrate erred in setting aside subpoena – Where documents have been produced to applicant – Where no practical utility in granting relief – Whether need to correct manifest error – Where not clear that subpoena had legitimate forensic purpose in context of committal proceedings – Where not clear whether Supreme Court able to grant relief sought – Leave refused STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 53(3)(a) – Whether setting aside subpoena within the meaning of "order" – Meaning of "any person" – Meaning of "against" – Meaning of "in relation to the person" – Use of extrinsic materials – Explanatory note and second reading speech CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – Committal proceedings – Whether legitimate forensic purpose in issuing subpoena in committal proceedings under new legislative scheme where no facility for defendant to adduce evidence APPEALS – Leave to appeal – Remedies – Scope of Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 55(3)(a) – Whether orders for production to Supreme Court available APPEALS – Leave to appeal – Remedies – Alternative relief sought – Certiorari refused for discretionary reasons mirroring reasons for refusing leave to appeal – Declaration refused on basis that such relief would be an advisory opinion APPEALS – Procedure – Time limits – Extension of time – Where not opposed – Extension granted Legislation Cited: (NSW) Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998, s 29(1)(e) (NSW) Courts Legislation Amendment Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, ss 53(3), 55(3)(a) (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act, s 5F (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986, ss 55, 58, 91, 93, 170, 222, 283C(5) (NSW) Justice Legislation Amendment (Committals and Guilty Pleas) Act 2017 (NSW) Justices Act 1902, ss 104(3)-(4) (NSW) Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 51B r 5(5) Cases Cited: Application of the Attorney-General for NSW dated 4 April 2014 (2014) 246 A Crim R 150; [2014] NSWCCA 251 Attorney-General (NSW) v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667; 75 A Crim R 8 Commissioner of Police v Chidgey [2007] NSWSC 417 DPP v SW [2009] NSWSC 524 Fantakis v Local Court of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 931 Feeney v New South Wales Police [2016] NSWSC 1708 Franklin v Commissioner of Police [2018] NSWSC 310 Jolley v DPP [2020] NSWSC 1406 Mackintosh v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2010] NSWSC 1064 Mann v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWSC 369 Murdoch v Petterson [2005] NSWSC 1359 Potier v Maloney [2005] NSWSC 336 R v Abdullah (1999) 6 Crim LN 54 [1025]; [1999] NSWCCA 188 R v Colby (1995) 84 A Crim R 125 R v Keeling (NSWCCA, Cole JA, Smart and James JJ, 060359/1996, 5 September 1996, unreported); (1997) 4 Crim LN 1 [647] R v Smith (1996) 86 A Crim R 308 R v Stig (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), Mahoney ACJ, Simpson and Barr JJ, 17 October 1996, unreported) Smithers v Beveridge (1994) 14 ACSR 197 Steele v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWSC 926 Thompson v DPP (2014) 21(11) Crim LN [3453]; [2014] NSWSC 522 Warburton v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2017] NSWSC 69 Williams v Cronin [2014] NSWSC 1578 Texts Cited: Explanatory Note, Courts Legislation Amendment Bill 1999 (NSW) New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 4 December 2001 New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 11 October 2017 New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 2 June 1999 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fuaeka Paulo (Plaintiff) Commissioner of Police (First Defendant) Local Court of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Lewer (Plaintiff) K Curry (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate