NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice v Feeney [2021] NSWCATAP 139 Hearing dates: 16 April 2021 Date of orders: 18 May 2021 Decision date: 18 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Hennessy ADCJ, Deputy President A Britton, Principal Member Decision: The appeal is dismissed under s 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) as misconceived or lacking in substance. Catchwords: APPEAL – moot appeal – where agency had complied with Tribunal's orders, but sought to appeal – power of Appeal Panel to determine appeal – general rule - discretion to hear a moot appeal – factors to be taken into account Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bass v Permanent Trustee Company Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334; [1999] HCA 9 Commissioner of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Commissioner of Taxation v Industrial Equity ltd (2000) 98 FCR 573; [2000] FCA 420 Gardner v Dairy Industry Authority of New South Wales [1977] 18 ALR 55 Hunter Development Corporation v Save our Rail NSW Incorporated (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 375; 93 NSWLR 704 Jardin v Metcash Ltd (2011) 285 ALR 677; [2011] NSWCA 409 People with Disability Australia Incorporated v Minister for Disability Services [2011] NSWCA 253 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (Apopellant) Steven Feeney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Birch (Appellant) B Tronson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate