NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sentinel Orange Homemaker Pty Ltd v Davis Investment Group Holdings Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2021] NSWSC 550 Hearing dates: 26-28 April 2021 Date of orders: 18 May 2021 Decision date: 18 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Declarations to be made to the effect that the plaintiff validly terminated the contract and is entitled to the deposit. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction and interpretation – contract for sale of land – condition precedent that purchaser obtain a development approval by 31 March 2020 – Council approved development on 17 March 2020 – development approval informally notified to purchaser by following day – signed development approval documents not sent to purchaser until 2 April 2020 – held that purchaser did not obtain development approval by 31 March 2020 – condition precedent not satisfied CONTRACTS – termination – principle that a party cannot exercise contractual right in reliance upon event resulting from its own default – purchaser required to use all reasonable endeavours to obtain development approval – purchaser terminated contract due to lack of development approval –substantial chance that purchaser would have obtained development approval had they used reasonable endeavours – held that purchaser not entitled to terminate contract LAND LAW – deposits – contract for sale of land – purchaser paid $100,000 deposit – purchaser's wrongful termination constituted repudiation – vendor accepted repudiation and terminated contract – vendor entitled to deposit Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s 4.18(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) r 102(1) Cases Cited: Abourjaily v Parkview Estate Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1256 Actall Pty Ltd v Pacific Bay Development Pty Ltd (2006) ANZ ConvR 65; [2005] NSWSC 1067 Al Achrafi v Topic (2016) 18 BPR 36,517; [2016] NSWSC 1807 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Ex parte Forssberg; In re Council of the Shire of Warringah (1927) 27 SR (NSW) 200 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Joseph Street Pty Ltd v Tan (2012) 38 VR 241; [2012] VSCA 113 Little v Fairfield Municipal Council (1962) 8 LGRA 64 Mordue v Kroone (2009) 14 BPR 26,771; [2009] NSWSC 255 Notaras v Waverley Council (2007) 161 LGERA 230; [2007] NSWCA 333 Plumor Pty Ltd v Handley (1996) 41 NSWLR 30 Shanahan v Strathfield Municipal Council [1973] 2 NSWLR 740 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Tamanna v Zattere (2017) 18 BPR 37,139; [2017] NSWSC 1388 Waters Lane Pty Ltd v Sweeney (2008) Aust Contract R 90-287; [2007] NSWCA 200 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sentinel Orange Homemaker Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Davis Investment Group Holdings Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Gor (Plaintiff) Mr D Brakell (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate