NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Archer (No 1) [2021] NSWSC 569 Hearing dates: 17, 18 May 2021 Date of orders: 21 May 2021 Decision date: 21 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) The ERISP is inadmissible. (2) The body worn video recordings are admissible. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - admissions - lies as admissions - consciousness of guilt - application of Evidence Act - clumsy - whether accused intoxicated at time of making admissions - brown liquor - diazepam - droopy - dispute between witnesses - police officers evidence inconsistent with video recordings - body worn video - electronically recorded interview - accused received legal advice - accused stated he did not wish to be interviewed - continuing questioning calculated to have accused bear witness against himself - objection on various bases CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - reliability of admissions - whether truth of admissions unlikely to be affected - lies - whether untruth affected - circumstances in which lies were told - evidence admissible on this basis CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - admissions - lies - where accused seeks to exercise right to silence - continued questioning by police - accused drowsy and affected by drugs - evidence obtained improperly - discretion to admit in spite of impropriety - where impropriety deliberate - systemic - evidence excluded on this basis CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - admissions - lies - unfairness discretion - onus on accused - onus discharged - evidence excluded on this basis Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 142, 143 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 85, 90, 138 Cases Cited: Kadir v R; Grech v R (2020) 267 CLR 109; [2020] HCA 1 Plevac v R (1995) 84 A Crim R 570 R v Al Batat (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1061 R v Esposito (1998) 45 NSWLR 442; 105 A Crim R 27 R v FE [2013] NSWSC 1692 R v GH (2000) 105 FCR 419; [2000] FCA 1618 R v Helmhout [2000] NSWSC 208; (2000) 112 A Crim R 10 R v Horton (1998) 45 NSWLR 426; 104 A Crim R 306 R v Ireland (1970) 126 CLR 321; [1970] HCA 21 R v Kerrie Anne Clarke (1997) 97 A Crim R 414 R v Ostojic (1978) 18 SASR 188 R v Phan (2001) 53 NSWLR 480; [2001] NSWCCA 29 R v Pitts (No 1) [2012] NSWSC 1652 R v Smith (1992) 58 SASR 491 R v Taleb [2019] NSWSC 241 R v Tarantino (No 6) [2019] NSWSC 1174 R v Ye Zhang [2000] NSWSC 1099 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina Richard Archer Representation: Counsel: G Harrison (Regina) T Anderson (Archer)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate