NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Wran (a pseudonym) [2021] NSWDC 185 Hearing dates: 12 and 14 May 2021 Date of orders: 14 May 2021 Decision date: 14 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: The defence is entitled to a directed verdict on count 5. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Directions to jury — Verdict by direction Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, s 66C, s 66DB, s 66DD, s 80G Interpretation Act 1987, s 34, s 35 Cases Cited: Doney v The Queen [1990] HCA 51; (1990) 171 CLR 207 Ford v R [2016] NSWCCA 69 May v O'Sullivan [1955] HCA 38; (1955) 92 CLR 654 R v C [2006] 1 Cr App R 20 R v Claydon [2005] EWCA Crim 2827 R v Martin Stanley Claridge [2017] NSWDC 407 R v MM (No 2) [2018] NSWDC 528 R v Pickford [1995] QB 203 R v PL [2012] NSWCCA 31 R v Richard (1986) 30 CCC (3d) 127 R v Tyrrell [1894] 1 QB 710 R v Whitehouse [1977] QB 868 Texts Cited: Complicity [2010] NSWLRC 129 Gillies, P, Criminal Law (4th ed, LBC Information Services, 1997) Lee, Murray; Crofts, Thomas; Salter, Michael; Milivojevic, Sanja; McGovern, Alyce, "Let's Get Sexting': Risk, Power, Sex and Criminalisation in the Moral Domain" [2013] IntJlCrimJustSocDem 4; (2013) 2(1) International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 35 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina David Wran (a pseudonym) (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Walsh (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate