NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Hearn (formerly DAO (No 4)) v R [2021] NSWCCA 103 Hearing dates: 26 April 2021 Decision date: 21 May 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] N Adams J at [2] Hidden AJ at [3] Decision: (1) Application for extension of time granted. (2) Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against conviction – charges of sexual abuse of children – credibility of prosecution witness who had committed offences of the same kind – claim by witness that he had revealed the whole of his offending – witness subsequently convicted of further offences of the same kind – those convictions relied upon as fresh evidence – whether those convictions could be used as evidence of the witness's guilt of those additional offences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 474D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(b) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 91, 106 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Burden [2005] NSWCA 174 DAO v R (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 126 Hollington v Hewthorn & Co Ltd [1943] KB 587 MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260 R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356; 149 A Crim R 417 R v Davidson (No 1) [2019] NSWSC 980 R v Heuston [2003] NSWCCA 172; 140 A Crim R 422 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Anthony O'Hearn (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Dalton SC, M Curry (Applicant) H Roberts (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate