NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Togias v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2021] NSWSC 573 Hearing dates: 27 April, 21 May 2021 Date of orders: 21 May 2021 Decision date: 21 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [45] Catchwords: EQUITY – pleading and particulars – plaintiff claims to be entitled to a share of the two properties by way of common intention constructive trust under Muschinski v Dodds principle – pleading and particulars – form of prayers for relief required in statement of claim – particulars of quantum of plaintiff's contributions to alleged common venture unnecessary – interlocutory orders – plaintiff seeks to remain in occupation of one of the properties and to have proceeds of second property held pending determination of her claim – plaintiff required to give undertakings to pay interest and occupation fee if required Legislation Cited: Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1980 (NSW), ss 22, 23, 24, 25 Cases Cited: Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 New South Wales Crime Commission v Subakti [2016] NSWSC 1421 Togias v NSW Crime Commission [2019] NSWSC 1556 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: New South Wales Trustee and Guardian (Applicant/Second Defendant) Nicolitsa Togias (Respondent/Plaintiff) Representation: Counsel: T Hale SC (Applicant) M Sneddon (Respondent)
Solicitors: ProActive Legal (Applicant) Fox & Staniland Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/189689 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate