NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Makaroff v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District [2021] NSWCA 107 Hearing dates: 6 October 2020 Date of orders: 28 May 2021 Decision date: 28 May 2021 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Brereton JA at [81]; Simpson AJA at [208] Decision: With respect to the second respondent (Dr Percy): (1) appeal against the order for judgment in favour of the second respondent (the second defendant below) dismissed; (2) appellant to pay the second respondent's costs of the appeal; With respect to the first respondent: (3) appeal allowed; order for judgment in favour of the first respondent (the first defendant below) set aside; (4) order that judgment be entered for the appellant against the first respondent in the sum of $276,319.95, with effect from 14 June 2019; (5) first respondent to pay the appellant's costs at first instance and of the appeal; (6) liberty to any party to apply, within 14 days, with respect to costs, calculation of damages and interest; (7) Notice of Contention dismissed. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE — medical negligence — breach of duty — whether failure to advise the appellant that it was essential and urgent to organise orthopaedic review of injured shoulder constituted breach NEGLIGENCE — medical negligence — peer professional opinion – Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 5O – whether the respondents acted in a manner that was widely accepted by peer professional opinion as competent professional practice NEGLIGENCE — medical negligence — causation — factual causation — whether it was more probable than not that the appellant would have had a better outcome but for the negligence – whether the appellant would have consulted an orthopaedic surgeon – whether the appellant would have undergone surgery prior to her shoulder injury becoming inoperable Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5D, 5E, 5O, 5P Cases Cited: Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak (2009) 239 CLR 420; [2009] HCA 48 Ambulance Service of NSW v Worley [2006] NSWCA 102 F v R (1983) 33 SASR 189 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Robinson Helicopter Co Inc v McDermott [2016] HCA 22; (2016) 90 ALJR 679 Lee v Lee (2019) 266 CLR 129; [2019] HCA 28 McKenna v Hunter and New England Local Health District [2013] NSWCA 476 Paul v Cooke (2013) 85 NSWLR 167; [2013] NSWCA 311 Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479; [1992] HCA 58 Sparks v Hobson [2018] NSWCA 29 Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537; [2010] HCA 12 Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375; [2013] HCA 19 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Diana Makaroff (Appellant) Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (First Respondent) Dr Paul Percy (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Sheller SC (Appellant) J Downing SC (First Respondent) M Hutchings / C Coventry (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate