NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abousleiman v R [2021] NSWCCA 110 Hearing dates: 21 April 2021 Date of orders: 4 June 2021 Decision date: 04 June 2021 Before: Davies J at [1]; Hamill J at [3]; Wilson J at [44] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence - single ground - manifest excess - drug supply - ongoing supply of cocaine - supplying a commercial quantity MDMA - more than a street dealer - strong subjective case - rehabilitation - death of cousins leading to downward spiral - substantial adjustment to standard non-parole period - sentencing discretion - whether sentence plainly wrong or unjust - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25, 25A Cases Cited: Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Edwards v R [2021] NSWCCA 57 Glare v R [2015] NSWCCA 194 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lowndes v R (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Abousleiman (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Trevallion (Applicant) S Traynor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate