NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wardle v Howard [2021] NSWSC 618 Hearing dates: 25 May 2021 Decision date: 25 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: 1. Make orders in accordance with order 1 of the orders sought in the notice of motion filed 23 March 2021 (see at [2]). 2. Costs be costs in the cause. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Subpoenas – Objection to production of documents – Client legal privilege EVIDENCE – Privileges – Client legal privilege – Waiver Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 121, 131A Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Kamisha Corp Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-697; [1999] FCA 681 GR Capital Group Pty Ltd v Xinfeng Australia International Investment Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 266 In the matter of Northern Energy Corporation Ltd (2020) 147 ACSR 572; [2020] NSWSC 1073 Jaeger v Bowden [2015] NSWSC 1479 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 66 Rich v Harrington (2007) 245 ALR 106; [2007] FCA 1987 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Weston (2011) 81 NSWLR 526; [2011] NSWSC 1083 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Marjorie Wardle (Plaintiff) Peter Russell Howard as Executor of the Estate of Devorah Minna Isabel Howard (First Defendant) Peter Russell Howard (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Stapleton (Plaintiff) S Docker (Defendants) Solicitors: Lewarne & Goldsmith Solicitors (Plaintiff) Conditsis Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2020/00049111 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate