NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Edway Training Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2021] NSWCATAD 152 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 3 June 2021 Decision date: 03 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: P H Molony, Senior Member Decision: 1. Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing in this matter. 2. The application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – administrative review jurisdiction – no jurisdiction to administratively review a decision by Safework NSW to refuse to enter into a contract with a Registered Training Organisation to do General Construction Induction Training in NSW Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: Dubow v Mid-Western Regional Council [2019] NSWCATAP 242 White v Sutherland Shire Council [2019] NSWCATAD 100 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Edway Training Pty Ltd (Applicant) SafeWork NSW (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: A Soriano (Agent) (Applicant) S. Hedger (Legal Officer) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00029653 Publication restriction: Nil
reasons for decision
Introduction. 1. On 26 August 2020 Edway Training Services Proprietary Limited (Edway) applied to SafeWork NSW to enter an agreement to conduct General Construction Induction Training (GTI) as a registered training organisation (RTO). That application was refused in writing on 8 December 2020. The notice of refusal advised Edway that it could seek an internal review of that decision. This it did, in writing, on 16 December 2020. 2. On 13 January 2021, an internal review decision advised that the decision to refuse to enter an agreement with Edway to conduct GIT was affirmed, with SafeWork NSW relying on its right to refuse to accept an application from an RTO to deliver GIT, under the RTO conditions for delivering GIT in New South Wales. The decision advised that Edway could seek external review in the Tribunal within 28 days. 3. On 2 February 2021 Edway filed an administrative review application with the Tribunal with respect to that decision. 4. From the commencement of the proceedings SafeWork NSW has argued, despite its earlier advice to the contrary, that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to review a decision by SafeWork NSW to refuse to enter an agreement to conduct GIT with Edway. 5. At a directions hearing held on 2 March 2021 the Tribunal ordered that the parties file submissions relating to the jurisdictional issue and noted that: The parties agree that hearing can be dispensed with under section 50 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and the jurisdictional issue is to be determined on the papers after 6 April 2021. 1. That timetable was later extended to 13 April 2021 by consent. 2. The jurisdictional issue has now been referred to me to determine without a hearing.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate