NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ferguson [2021] NSWDC 226 Hearing dates: 26 March 2021 Decision date: 09 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: SENTENCE: Aggregate sentence of 3 years 4 months with a non- parole period of 2 years 1 month. PROCEEDS OF CRIME- forfeiture order $23,650 Catchwords: CRIME – possess prohibited firearm while subject to firearms prohibition order - Use unregistered firearm-prohibited firearm - Deal with property proceeds of crime under $100,000- possess ammunition CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Back up and related offence – not guilty plea- Deal with property proceeds of crime under $100,000 - what is a reasonable suspicion - guilty verdict- reasonable grounds to suspect that the property was the proceeds of crime SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — late guilty plea- offer to plea to similar facts rejected by prosecution in local court- level of utilitarian discount determined - underlying purpose of the early guilty plea scheme- related offence defended- application of sentencing principle- purposes of sentencing - need for individualised sentence – time in custody- evidence about the offender's background uncontroversial- unsworn evidence going to the objective circumstances of the offending of little value- offender's medical condition and problems obtaining treatment in custody - ill‑health can mitigate punishment - assistance by facilitating surrender of pistol SUMMARY HEARING:- Deal with property proceeds of crime under $100,000 - guilty verdict Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Act 1996 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Anderson v R (1992) 62 A Crim R 277 Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58 Chen v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2011] NSWCCA 205 CMB v Attorney General NSW (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Ngo [2012] NSWSC 1521 Do v R [2010] NSWCCA 182 Edens v Clearly [1975} 1 NSWLR 278 Ex Parte Patmoy; Re Jack (1944) SR (NSW) 351 Forrest v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCA 162 George v Rocket (1990) 170 CLR 104; 93 ALR 483; 64 ALJR 384; 48 A Crim R 246 at 115 Grant v The Queen (1981) 147 CLR 503 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520 Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) AC 942 Irwin V R [2019[ NSWCCA 133 Olbrich v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v AZ (2011) 205 A Crim R R v Buckett (1994) 132 ALR 669 R v Ditmar [1973] NSWLR 722 R v English (1989) 17 NSWLR 149 R v JDX, JDX v R [2017] NSWCCA 9 R v Krstic [2005} NSWCCA 391 R v McKellar (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 106 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Zotti [2002] SASC 164; (2002) 82 SASR 554 Sumrein v R [2019] NSWCCA 83 The Queen v Grant (1981) 147 CLR 503 The Queen v Pham 2015) 256 CLR 550 [2015] HCA 39 Tran v R [2010] NSWCCA 183; [2010] NSWCCA 183 Texts Cited: Early Guilty Pleas: A New Ball Game, Ierace M., 4 April 2018, Public Defender Papers The Hon Attorney General NSW, 2nd Reading Speech, Justice Legislation Amendment (Committals and Guilty Pleas) Act 2017, Hansard, Legislative assembly, 11.10.17 page 10 Category: Sentence Parties: Derek Scott Ferguson (the offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr D Dalton SC (for the offender) Ms N Keay, Crown Prosecutor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate