NSW Caselaw
NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: OBQ [2020] NSWCATGD 59 Hearing dates: 11 September 2020 and 25 September 2020 Date of orders: 25 September 2020 Decision date: 25 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: R H Booby, Senior Member (Legal) Dr G Jamieson, Senior Member (Professional) K Laurence, General Member (Community) Decision: In relation to the enduring power of attorney made by OBQ on 9 October 2017 which appointed DZC as attorney/s. The Tribunal determines, orders or declares: not to carry out a review of the revocation of the enduring power of attorney. In relation to the enduring power of attorney made by OBQ on 6 April 2018 which appointed LAQ and TYQ as attorney/s. The Tribunal determines, orders or declares: to carry out a review of the operation and effect of the enduring power of attorney; not to make an order under s 36 of the Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW) and dismiss the application. Catchwords: REVIEW OF AN ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY – review of the operation and effect of an enduring power of attorney – whether adequate records kept – whether attorneys gained personal benefit – whether conflict of interest arises – subject person retains capacity to instruct – not in subject person's interests to overturn subject person's decisions – no order made. REVIEW OF AN ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY – review of the revocation of an enduring power of attorney – subject person possibly influenced but will not overborne – no evidence of weight indicating undue influence – no evidence of weight indicating the subject person was confused or misled – decision not to review revocation. Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), Pt 3A Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW), ss 36, 36(1)-(2), 12(1) Cases Cited: Re R [2000] NSWSC 886 Slattery J in Susan Elizabeth Parker v Margaret Catherine Higgins & Ors [2012] NSWSC 1516 Susan Elizabeth Parker v Margaret Catherine Higgins & Ors [2012] NSWSC 1516 Tulloch (deceased) v Braybon (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 650 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: 001: Review of an Enduring Power of Attorney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate