NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Papanicolaou (No 1) [2021] NSWSC 659 Hearing dates: 09 June 2021 Date of orders: 09 June 2021 Decision date: 09 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wright J Decision: 1. Vacate the trial to commence on 10 June 2021 in this matter. 2. List the matter in the Arraignments List on 2 July 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Indonesian accused charged with murder – Issue of whether accused was substantially impaired within s 23A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) raised – Defence application to vacate trial date – Vacation said to be required so as to allow proper investigation and consideration of issues, including transcultural psychiatric issues, raised in report of an Indonesian psychiatrist – Vacation said to be required so as to allow proper investigation and consideration of whether MRI should be obtained to: (a) determine whether the accused suffered a traumatic brain injury as a result of a motor vehicle accident leaving her in a coma for two weeks when she was six years old; and (b), if so, the extent to which this was relevant to the issue of substantial impairment within s 23A of the Crimes Act – Application to vacate trial granted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Alexandroaia (1995) 81 A Crim R 286 R v Boyd [2017] NSWSC 1099 R v Hunter [2013] NSWSC 1713 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Hanny Papanicolaou (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Maxwell QC (Crown) T Quilter (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate