NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nitopi v Nitopi [2021] NSWSC 669 Hearing dates: 09 June 2021 Date of orders: 11 June 2021 Decision date: 11 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Application dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – civil – circumstances in which court may strike out pleadings or dismiss proceedings at an interlocutory stage – where defendant contends plaintiff allegedly used criminal conduct to prevent or hinder him from defending claim and prosecuting cross-claim – where defendant fails to establish that plaintiff stole unspecified documents relevant to proceedings during course of committing offences for which she has been found guilty – where defendant argues that plaintiff's delays cause him significant prejudice – where unclear connection between allegedly stolen documents and defendant's forensic position – where defendant's reliance on UCPR 14.28 is misplaced – where no evidence of inexcusable or substantial delay Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 14.28 Cases Cited: Clark v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 139 Nitopi v Nitopi [2019] NSWCA 81 Palavi v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 264 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Cristina Pirello Nitopi (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Guiseppe Nitopi (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Christina Nitopi (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Stitt QC with H Stitt (Applicant/Defendant) J Loofs SC (Respondent/Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate