NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v R [2021] NSWCCA 118 Hearing dates: 5 March 2021 Date of orders: 18 June 2021 Decision date: 18 June 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Walton J at [2]; Button J at [114] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – finding of special circumstances – sentencing ratio – whether failure to give proper practical effect – discretion of sentencing judge – prospects of rehabilitation CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – whether House v King error – whether material error – incorrect reference to Form 1 offence – slip – whether sentence vitiated CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – aggregate sentence whether manifestly excessive – property and domestic violence offences – whether indicative sentences erroneous so as to infect sentence imposed – use of JIRS statistics – objective gravity – general deterrence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 111, 148, 192E Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13 Cases Cited: Ahmad v R [2019] NSWCCA 198 Burr v R [2020] NSWCCA 282 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Casey v R [2015] NSWCCA 142 Clarke v R [2009] NSWCCA 49 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 JM v R (2014) 246 A Crim R 528; [2014] NSWCCA 297 Langbein v R [2013] NSWCCA 88 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Marshall v R [2007] NSWCCA 24 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327; [1999] NSWCCA 435 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704; [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Speechley (2012) 221 A Crim R 175; [2012] NSWCCA 130 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Woods [2019] NSWDC 401 SS v R [2016] NSWCCA 197 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 The Queen v Kilic (2016) 259 CLR 256; [2016] HCA 48 Vuni v R [2006] NSWCCA 171 Windle v R [2011] NSWCCA 277 Zaky v R (Cth) [2017] NSWCCA 141 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thanh Lam Nguyen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Parsons (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate