NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lou v R [2021] NSWCCA 120 Hearing dates: 24 March 2021 Date of orders: 18 June 2021 Decision date: 18 June 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Campbell J at [2] Hamill J at [3] Decision: (1) Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - credit card fraud and identity theft - skimming devices - proceeds of crime - grave criminality - exceptional hardship to children - where husband and wife both incarcerated - finding reflected in adjustment to non-parole period - "crafting" sentence to facilitate availability of intensive corrections order - contrary to orthodoxy - sentence severe but not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 3, Div 3 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 193B, 192E, 193C, 192J, 192K Cases Cited: Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 Mandranis v R [2021] NSWCCA 97 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Thangavelautham v R [2016] NSWCCA 141 Yow v R [2010] NSWCCA 251 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Li Lou (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Parsons (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate