NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Morton v Berry [2021] NSWCATAP 174 Hearing dates: 14 April 2021 Date of orders: 17 June 2021 Decision date: 17 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member L Wilson, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is refused. 2. The Appeal is allowed. 3. The decision below is varied, such that order 1 is now as follows: Ms Morton the respondent is to pay Ms Berry the applicant the sum of $5,654.14. 4. We order that any amount overpaid by the appellant under the order as now varied be repaid by the respondent, within 14 days. 5. No order as to costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW) – renewal of proceedings – meaning of 'fencing work' Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW) Cases Cited: Browne & Keith [2015] FamCAFC 143 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Justine Morton (Appellant) Jennifer Berry (Respondent) Representation: G Morton (Appellant) K Taylor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00056084 (AP 21/05592) Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: n/a Date of Decision: 5 February 2021 Before: J Levingston, General Member File Number(s): COM 20/39436
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate