NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dwyer v Volkswagen Group Australia Pty Ltd t/as Volkswagen Australia [2021] NSWSC 715 Hearing dates: 18-20, 24-25, 31 May and 1 June 2021 Decision date: 18 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: The plaintiff's case fails Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Representative proceedings – Sale of goods – claim that Volkswagen vehicles were not of acceptable quality for the purposes of s 54 of the Australian Consumer Law by reason of being fitted with driver side Takata airbags – where airbags contained a propellant ("PSAN") that had propensity to degrade when exposed to moisture and temperature fluctuations – whether plaintiff established any functionally significant propensity of the PSAN to degrade in the airbag in his vehicle such as to cause it to explode or malfunction – whether the airbag in the defendant's vehicle did not malfunction – where defendant replaced the airbag in the plaintiff's vehicle without cost – whether the plaintiff established any loss by reason of any want of acceptable quality in his vehicle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Consumer Goods (Motor Vehicles With Affected Takata Airbag Inflators and Specified Spare Parts) Recall Notice 2018 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jayco Corp Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1672 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Top Snack Foods Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 752 Courtney v Medtel Pty Ltd (2003) 126 FCR 219; [2003] FCA 36 Farley v Skinner [2002] 2 AC 732 Gill v Ethicon Sarl (No 5) [2019] FCA 1905 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2000) 102 FCR 307; [2000] FCA 1099 HTW Valuers (Central Qld) Pty Ltd v Astonland Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 640; [2004] HCA 54 Kizbeau Pty Ltd v WG & B Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 281; [1995] HCA 4 Medtel Pty Ltd v Courtney (2003) 130 FCR 182; [2003] FCAFC 151 New South Wales Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd v Kuzmanovski (2011) 195 FCR 234; [2011] FCAFC 106 Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 Prestige Auto Traders Australia Pty Ltd v Bonnefin [2017] NSWSC 149 Steiner v Magic Carpet Tours Pty Ltd (1984) ASC 55-366; (1984) ATPR 40-490 Wyzenbeek v Australasian Marine Imports Pty Ltd (In Liq) (2019) 272 FCR 373; [2019] FCAFC 167 Zoneff v Elcom Credit Union Ltd (1990) 94 ALR 445 Texts Cited: Concise Oxford English Dictionary, online ed, accessed 15 June 2021 Explanatory Memorandum, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law P Herzfeld and T Prince, Interpretation, (2nd ed, 2020, Thomson Reuters) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Philip Dwyer as representative plaintiff (Plaintiff) Volkswagen Group Australia Pty Ltd trading as Volkswagen Australia (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C R C Newlinds SC with D Barnett (Plaintiff) S J Free SC with I Ahmed and C Winnett (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate