NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: GR v Department of Communities and Justice [2021] NSWSC 721 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 18 June 2021 Decision date: 18 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: 1. Grant leave to the first and second defendants to have access to the material produced by the Queensland Police Service in this proceeding in answer to the subpoena issued on 4 March 2021. Catchwords: EVIDENCE — Privileges — Client legal privilege — Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 120, 131A — Privilege claimed over documents produced under subpoena by third party — Whether common law or statute applies — Legal professional privilege — Dominant purpose test Legislation Cited: Child Protection Act 1999 (Qld), ss 186(2), 189 Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW), ss 86, 91, 93 Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012 (Qld), s 159 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 117, 120, 122, 131A Cases Cited: Armstrong Strategic Management & Marketing Pty Ltd v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd (2012) 295 ALR 348; [2012] NSWCA 430 Barnes v Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 242 ALR 601; [2007] FCAFC 88 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1999) 201 CLR 49; [1999] HCA 67 Grant v Downs (1976) 11 ALR 577 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 In the matter of Northern Energy Corporation Ltd (2020) 147 ACSR 572; [2020] NSWSC 1073 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 66 New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation [2011] NSWCA 60 NU v Secretary of Family and Community Services (NSW) (2017) 95 NSWLR 577; [2017] NSWCA 221 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Weston (2011) 81 NSWLR 526; [2011] NSWSC 1083 SL v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2016] NSWCA 124 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: GR (Plaintiff) Department of Communities and Justice (First Defendant) Minister for Families, Communities and Disability Services (Second Defendant) The father (Third Defendant) Krstina Wooi (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: GR (self-represented) M Anderson (First and Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate