NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Dowling [2021] NSWSC 726 Hearing dates: 1 and 2 February 2021; last submissions received 23 February 2021 Date of orders: 21 June 2021 Decision date: 21 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rees J Decision: Defendant found guilty of contempt. Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES – apprehended bias – application for recusal – applicant published disparaging statements about judge and other judges of the court – statement by applicant about judges did not lead to apprehension that presiding judge may decide the case other than on its merits – judge determined earlier motion – principles at [12]-[18] – earlier motion on different subject matter – applicant did not give evidence – no findings of fact – no credit findings – no matter determined on a final basis – application refused. CIVIL PROCEDURE – transfer of proceedings for apprehended bias – principles at [25] – application previously made – no change in circumstances since earlier application – Court should determine charge of contempt of its orders – application refused. CONTEMPT – criminal contempt – orders restraining publication of text messages and blog – order to remove blog from website – orders served on publisher of website – blog continued to be published – evidence established that defendant was publisher of the website – criminal contempt proved. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 10.14 Cases Cited: Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98; [1986] HCA 46 Australian National Industries Ltd v Spedley Securities Ltd (in liq) (1992) 26 NSWLR 411 Barakat v Goritsas (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 36 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell (2002) 7 VR 524; [2002] VSCA 197 Capilano Honey Ltd v Mulvany (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 767 Chamoun v District Court of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 187 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Salvato (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 321 Doe v Dowling [2017] NSWSC 1793 Doe v Dowling [2017] NSWSC 202 Doe v Dowling [2019] NSWSC 1222 Dowling v Seven Network (Operations) Ltd; Dowling v Capilano Honey Ltd; Dowling v Jane [2019] HCASL 311 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim (2012) 83 NSWLR 52; [2012] NSWCCA 125 Farahbakht v Midas Australia Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1322 Furlong v Wise & Young [2019] NSWSC 1718 Green v The Queen (1971) 126 CLR 28; [1971] HCA 55 Hills Shire Council v Mouawad [2014] NSWLEC 59; (2014) 203 LGERA 233 In the matter of Jimmy's Recipe Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 93 Kirby v Centro Properties Ltd (No 2) (2011) 202 FCR 439; [2011] FCA 1144 Lunn v The Commissioner for Public Employment [2009] NSWSC 19 McLean v Nicholson [2002] VSC 446 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Mirus Australia Pty Ltd v Gage [2017] NSWSC 1046 News Digital Media Pty Ltd v Mokbel (2010) 30 VR 248; [2010] VSCA 51 Nominal Defendant v Manning (2000) 50 NSWLR 139; [2000] NSWCA 80 O'Connor v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (1995) 128 FLR 61 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Dowling [2017] NSWSC 392 R v Chatzidimitriou (2000) 1 VR 493; [2000] VSCA 91 R v Dookheea (2017) 262 CLR 402; [2017] HCA 36 R v Hinch [2013] VSC 520 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Dowling [2018] NSWSC 1890 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Dowling [2019] NSWSC 1760 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Trustees of the Christian Brothers v Cardone (1995) 57 FCR 327 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Seven Network (Operations) Ltd (First Plaintiff) Seven West Media Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Shane Dowling (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr K Smark SC (Plaintiffs) Defendant (Self Represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate