NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Monteleone v Thorn (No 10) [2021] NSWSC 729 Date of orders: 21 June 2021 Decision date: 21 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: Pursuant to rule 36.17 UCPR, the judgment will be amended to include the sum of $14,368.99 on account of interest on past economic loss. The judgment will now be for the sum of $1,435,339 (rounded down). Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – plaintiff applied for judgment to be amended pursuant to the slip rule – Rule 36.17 of the UCPR – inadvertence of counsel – interest sought on past economic loss Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Kelly v Thorn; Monteleone v Thorn (No 8) [2021] NSWSC 118 Kelly v Thorn; Monteleone v Thorn (No 9) [2021] NSWSC 599 L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) (1981) 151 CLR 590 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Ross Monteleone (formerly Poyser) (Plaintiff) Andrew Thorn (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Thorn Transport Pty Limited (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) William Andrew Kelly (First Cross-Defendant) William Richard Kelly (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Reynolds SC with A Renshaw (Plaintiff) D P Kelly (Defendants/Cross-Claimants) L D Robison (Cross-Defendants)
Solicitors: AR Conolly & Company Lawyers (Plaintiff) Gillis Delaney Lawyers (Defendants/Cross-Claimants) Benson Law (Cross-Defendants) File Number(s): 2016/74936 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate