NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kirkman v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act (No. 3) [2021] NSWSC 730 Hearing dates: Decided on the papers. Date of orders: 5 July 2021 Decision date: 05 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Application for judicial review dismissed. Submissions invited in relation to an appropriate order for costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – the applicant seeks judicial review of a 2017 decision made by the Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act 1989, the first respondent – the Court published a judgment on 30 October 2020 resolving a number of issues raised by the plaintiff – the Court invited further submissions from the Minister and submissions in reply from the applicant on two outstanding issues – the first issue being whether the applicant and second defendant's enclosure permits remained in conflict over a disputed portion of Crown road at the time of the 2017 decision – and if the enclosure permits are in conflict, whether that conflict requires resolution – the second issue being whether the Crown road is now enclosed, such that the enclosure permits can be lawfully cancelled. Legislation Cited: Crown Lands Act 1989, ss 67(1)(c), 67(1)(d) Roads Act 1993, Part 4, Division 2, s 37 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 6.11 Cases Cited: Kirkman v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act [2019] NSWSC 1683 Kirkman v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act (No. 2) [2020] NSWSC 1494 Kirkman v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act 1989 [2016] NSWSC 1876 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Plaintiff: Jennifer Kirkman First Defendant: Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act Second Defendant: Geoffrey Robert Wood & Jan Margaret Wood Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: S. Berveling
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate