NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stoneham v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2021] NSWSC 735 Hearing dates: 17 June 2021 Decision date: 24 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) Quash the sentence imposed on the plaintiff in the Local Court on 14 October 2020; (2) Remit the matter to the Local Court for sentence according to law. Catchwords: APPEALS – Procedure – Adjournment – Where Magistrate adjourned sentence proceedings pursuant to s 40 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) to avoid operation of s 58 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – Whether Magistrate erred in interpretation of s 58 – Whether incorrect interpretation of s 58 enlivened s 52 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Whether Magistrate's decision to adjourn sentence proceedings a reviewable error of law – Jurisdictional error Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 55 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 47, 58 Crimes Legislation Further Amendment Bill 2003 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 40 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 34 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 69, 75 Cases Cited: Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562; [2004] HCA 37 Brough v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] NSWSC 1396 R v West [2014] NSWCCA 250 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Stoneham (Plaintiff) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) Local Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Fraser (Plaintiff) Mr D Kell SC; Ms E Jones (First Respondent) Submitting Appearance (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate