State of New South Wales v Ibrahim (Final) [2021] NSWSC 793

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Ibrahim (Final) [2021] NSWSC 793 Hearing dates: 26 April and 14 May 2021; 17 and 18 May 2021 (written submissions) Date of orders: 20 May 2021 Decision date: 30 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: The Court confirms its orders of 20 May 2021. Catchwords: CIVIL – final hearing – application for extended supervision order – Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) – orders – reasons for decision – preconditions – whether defendant convicted NSW terrorism activity offender – language used by defendant – advocating support – terrorist act – violent extremism – threat of violence – promote person, group of persons or organisation or ideology – support terrorist act of violent extremism – mental state and delusions – personal views – whether the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of committing a serious terrorism offence if not kept under supervision during the period of extended supervision order – expert opinion of risk – mental illness – risk of relapse – susceptibility to influence – criminal history – parole and conditional liberty – approach to treatment – family support – community treatment order – duration – conditions – supervision movements and reporting – financial oversight – electronic monitoring, drugs and alcohol – counselling and medical treatments, associations – identity Legislation Cited: Community Protection Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Criminal Code (Terrorist Organisation—Al-Qa'ida) Regulations 2019 (Cth) Criminal Code (Terrorist Organisation—Islamic State) Regulations 2020 (Cth) Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: AAPT v Cable & Wireless Optus (1999) 32 ACSR 63; [1999] NSWSC 509 Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Riley (Final) [2019] NSWSC 1782 Australian Cement v Adelaide Brighton [2001] NSWSC 645 Chapman v Chapman [2007] NSWSC 1109 Cheema v State of New South Wales (2020) 102 NSWLR 714; [2020] NSWCA 190 First Class Securities Pty Limited v R Neuhaus [2019] NSWSC 1261 Hrdavec v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 1081 Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 4) (2017) 345 ALR 669; [2017] NSWCA 189 Lawrence v State of New South Wales (2020) 103 NSWLR 401; [2020] NSWCA 248 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 R v Ibrahim (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), Sully J and Bell AJ, 4 September 1996, unrep) R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 584 R v Mallah [2005] NSWSC 317 State New South Wales v Wilson (Preliminary) [2017] NSWSC 1367 State of New South Wales v Alam [2020] NSWSC 295 State of New South Wales v Ali [2010] NSWSC 1045 State of New South Wales v BP (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 806 State of New South Wales v BP (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 699 State of New South Wales v Bugmy [2017] NSWSC 855 State of New South Wales v Cheema (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 876 State of New South Wales v Church (Preliminary) [2021] NSWSC 246 State of New South Wales v Davis (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 754 State of New South Wales v Dunn [2019] NSWSC 426 State of New South Wales v Dunn (a pseudonym) (2018) 273 A Crim R 238; [2018] NSWSC 1008 State of New South Wales v Elmir [2019] NSWSC 1867 State of New South Wales v Farringdon [2018] NSWSC 874 State of New South Wales v Fisk [2013] NSWSC 364 State of New South Wales v Haider [2020] NSWSC 38 State of New South Wales v Naaman (Final) [2018] NSWSC 1635 State of New South Wales v Naaman (No 2) (2018) 365 ALR 179; [2018] NSWCA 328 State of NSW v Ceissman [2018] NSWSC 508 The State of New South Wales v Sharpe [2017] NSWSC 469 Wilde v State of New South Wales (2015) 249 A Crim R 65; [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Monzor Ibrahim (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Stern SC with A Zheng (Plaintiff) P David (Defendant)