NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ELQ v Public Guardian [2021] NSWCATAD 184 Hearing dates: 22 December 2020, 3 February 2021, 17 March 2021 Date of orders: 2 July 2021 Decision date: 02 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J McAteer, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the first respondent dated 28 August 2020 is affirmed. Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – Administrative Law – Decision of Public Guardian – Review under 80A – principles of guardianship – paramount consideration of the person subject to Guardianship Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Guardianship Act 1987 Cases Cited: DGR v Public Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 267 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA; (1979) 46 FLR 409 DYH v Public Guardian [2021] NSWCATAD 136 ECV v Public Guardian (2020) NSWCATAD 86 WL v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2011] NSWADTAP 22 Texts Cited: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (United Nations) 2006 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ELQ (Applicant) Public Guardian (First Respondent) DMO (Second Respondent) K Johnson (Guardian Ad Litem) Representation: Counsel: W Tregilgas (Applicant)
Solicitors: Felicio Law Firm (Applicant) M Rice (NSW Trustee & Guardian) (First Respondent) DMO's son as Agent (Second Respondent) K Johnson (Guardian Ad Litem) (Applicant) File Number(s): 2020/00269589 Publication restriction: Section 64 (1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 prohibiting or restricting the disclosure of the name of the applicant the second respondent or the subject person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate