NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jenkins v Secretary, Department of Education [2021] NSWCATAD 185 Hearing dates: 10 March 2021 Date of orders: 06 July 2021 Decision date: 06 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Decision: (1) Leave is granted under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) for the complaint against the Secretary, Department of Education to proceed. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — discrimination — equal opportunity — whether leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Teaching Service Act 1980 (NSW) Cases Cited: Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104 Laycock v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2006] NSWADT 261 Purvis v State of New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) (2003) 217 CLR 92; [2003] HCA 62 Wecker v The Delegate (the decision maker) to the President of the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board [2014] NSWCA 372 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Philip Jenkins (Applicant) Secretary, Department of Education (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (self-represented) Wotton and Kearney (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00030980 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate