NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Boikov v R [2021] NSWCCA 147 Hearing dates: 18 June 2021 Decision date: 05 July 2021 Before: McCallum JA at [1]; Rothman J at [2]; Wright J at [54] Decision: (1) Extension of time is granted to allow for the filing of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal; (2) Leave to appeal granted; (3) Appeal allowed; (4) Sentence imposed in the District Court on David Boikov on 9 August 2019 is quashed and, in lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to a non-parole period, being a term of imprisonment of 4 years and 8 months and 27 days, commencing 28 March 2017 and concluding 24 December 2021; with a remainder of term of 3 years and 3 months and 3 days, concluding 27 March 2025. The applicant will be first eligible for parole on 24 December 2021. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeal against sentence – failure to allow full utilitarian value for early plea of guilty – application of discount to aggregate sentence not indicative sentences – failure to specify non-parole period in indicative sentences that have a standard non-parole period – appeal allowed – applicant re-sentenced. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 3A; s 54B Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) s 25 Cases Cited: Aboud v The Queen [2021] NSWCCA 77; Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2; Davis v R [2015] NSWCCA 90; GAS v The Queen (2004) 217 CLR 198; [2004] HCA 22; Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49; House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40; Ibbotson (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2020] NSWCCA 92; Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37; R v Kilic (2016) 259 CLR 256; [2016] HCA; See v R [2020] NSWCCA 272; Thammavongsa v R (2015) 251 A Crim R 342; [2015] NSWCCA 107; Tuesley v R [2021] NSWCCA 58; Veen (No 2) (1988)164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Boikov (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H White (Applicant) K Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate